Study Information

dbGaP Study Accession: phs002631

NIH Institute/Center: NIDCD

RADx Data Program: RADx-rad

Release Date: 07/22/2022

DOI: 10.60773/cwrf-q204

Study Description: The COVID-19 pandemic is the most devastating infectious disease outbreak in a century, particularly in underserved and minoritized communities. In 2020 alone, it will cost a million lives. It continues to wreak economic havoc worldwide. Therefore, it is critical to develop new tools that can mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV- 2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Rapid screening tools can identify potentially infected individuals who can then be isolated/quarantined from the uninfected and directed towards further testing and treatment. Unfortunately, definitive viral testing for SARS-CoV-2 has proven difficult to implement in many countries, including the US, due to technical, financial and governmental hurdles to universal access and timely processing. Symptom-based screening offers a valuable, albeit imperfect, complement to viral testing that can help identify many individuals with the disease for isolation as well as treatment. A major challenge with symptomatic testing is that COVID-19 is highly protean: the heterogeneity of symptoms means no single symptom or constellation of symptoms is definitive diagnostically. Still, there is growing evidence that sudden partial or complete olfactory loss, even more than other symptoms such as fever or dry cough, is the single best predictor of COVID-19. In this project, objective, self-administered smell tests were developed and implemented for the purpose of identifying individuals with COVID-19 prior to, or in the absence of, viral testing, as well as for use in population-level surveillance of COVID-19 spread. Several kinds of objective tests were used in clinical or laboratory settings to assess an individual's olfactory ability, including those that test the ability to identify or discriminate odors as well as procedures to determine the lowest concentration an individual can reliably perceive (i.e., odor detection threshold). Each approach had technical and logistical advantages and disadvantages, and each captured different aspects of olfactory dysfunction. Regarding COVID-19, it is unknown what type of measure had the highest specificity or sensitivity. Aim 1 relied on the use of self-administered objective testing of odor identification and odor detection threshold in SARS-CoV-2-tested individuals to determine which olfactory measure was the best predictor of COVID-19. Aim 2 used objective smell testing to assess whether population monitoring of olfactory loss in university, municipal or other community settings can serve as a sentinel of COVID-19 community spread. Together, these studies provided a rapid, remote-friendly, cost-effective, scalable, non-intrusive method to screen for COVID-19 at the individual level and to assess prevalence in communities, especially those that have been traditionally underserved by the health care system and public health infrastructure.

Updated Date: 12/09/2022

Principal Investigator: Munger, Steven D

Has Data Files: Yes

Study Domain: Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT); Medical Device/Tool Development; Screening Testing

Data Collection Method: Chemosensory Testing Device

Keywords: Threshold Bayesian; Symptom-based Screening; Olfactory Function; Olfaction

Study Design: Cross-Sectional

Multi-Center Study: TRUE

Study Sites: UPenn; Arizona State University

Data Types: Individual Phenotype; Questionnaires/Surveys; Behavioral

Study Start Date: 12/21/2020

Study End Date: 01/31/2023

Species: Human Data

Estimated Cohort Size: 2000

Study Population Focus: Older Adults or Elderly; Adults; Underserved/Vulnerable Population; Racial and Ethnic Minorities

Publication URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37034638/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33860304/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34848930/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36469087/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37350646/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37595820/

Acknowledgement Statement: This study was supported through funding, 4U01DC019573-02, for the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) as part of the RADx-rad program. A special acknowledgment and appreciation goes to the participants and communities that made this study possible. Approved users should acknowledge the provision of data access by dbGaP for accession phs002631.v1.p1, and the NIH RADx Data Hub. Approved users should also acknowledge the specific version(s) of the dataset(s) obtained from the NIH RADx Data Hub.

Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number: RFA-OD-20-022

NIH Grant or Contract Number(s): 4U01DC019573-02

Consent/Data Use Limitations: General Research Use

Data Files
Total Files: 4
Data Files: 2
Metadata Files: 1
Dictionary Files: 1
Study Datasets Table
File Name
File Type
File Format(s)
# of Records
# of Variables
Metadata
Dictionary
rad_022_573-01_twinsburg_DATA_origcopy.csvTabular Data - Non-harmonizedcsv692
rad_022_573-01_twinsburg_DATA_transformcopy.csvTabular Data - Harmonizedcsv692